WD Facebook feed vs Slick Social Share Buttons which is better? (2024 compared)

Today we'll be comparing WD Facebook feed vs Slick Social Share Buttons , to ultimately help you decide which is the best solution for you. The information below is based on real data from our community of users like you, giving you a truly unbiased comparison. In the collection " Best Social Media Plugins for WordPress 2024" WD Facebook feed is ranked 11th while Slick Social Share Buttons is ranked 23rd.

WD Facebook feed dominates with an overall user/editors rating of 3.8/5 stars with 3 reviews and Slick Social Share Buttons user/editors rating is 3.1/5 stars with 3 reviews. This data is calculated in real-time from verified user reviews or editors rating if there isn't enough data for user rating.

If for whatever reason by the end of this comparison you are unable to choose between WD Facebook feed or Slick Social Share Buttons, we have included a few useful alternatives like Jetpack based on our community recommendations.

As far as Value for money goes, WD Facebook feed wins by 3.8 marks and WD Facebook feed is also voted as the easiest solution to use

Without further ado, let's look at a detailed breakdown of WD Facebook feed vs Slick Social Share Buttons

Pros & Cons


Why is WD Facebook feed better than Slick Social Share Buttons?


FindrScore (fs) The Scoring is based on our unique algorithm that looks at reviews, votes, behavior, social signals and more. Learn more
+89

8 Reasons to consider this

  • The quality of support has been rated to be better than Slick Social Share Buttons
  • Compared to others the price is reasonable
  • Offers free plan with multiple advanced features
  • Great features list
  • Has 15 highlight features
  • Has Sort & Filter
  • Has Responsive
  • Has Randomization
  • Best for Customer support
  • Best for Ease of use
  • Best for Low cost software
Scroll Down for more details

Why is Slick Social Share Buttons better than WD Facebook feed?


FindrScore (fs) The Scoring is based on our unique algorithm that looks at reviews, votes, behavior, social signals and more. Learn more
+52

5 Reasons to consider this

  • Compared to others the price is reasonable
  • Great features list
  • The core product is 100% free
  • Has 17 highlight features
  • Has Whitelabel
  • Has Various feed
  • Has Responsive
  • Best for Low cost software
Scroll Down for more details

Overview


WD Facebook feed WD Facebook feed
(3 votes)

N/A/5

G2
+

N/A/5

Capterra
+

N/A/5

Trustpilot

WD Facebook feed allows you easily to import Facebook photos, videos, and event events or read update with the latest on goings You have the option to import an unlimited amount of Facebook feeds... Read full review

Download/Demo
Comparison winner
Slick Social Share Buttons Slick Social Share Buttons
(3 votes)

N/A/5

G2
+

N/A/5

Capterra
+

N/A/5

Trustpilot

Many bloggers love Slick Social Sharing Buttons because this plugin is super simple to configure If you’re a novice, it doesn’t take long before you find your way around, the settings are... Read full review

Download/Demo

70 FS


44 FS


Reviews
Starting Price
Value for money 7.6/10 6/10
Quality of features score 7.4/10 6/10
Usability and Intuitiveness 7.4/10 5.6/10
Vendor Support 8.4/10 7/10
Likelihood of recommending
The reason for leaving
Custom Fields And Taxonomies
Unrated

Unrated
Randomization
Unrated

Unrated
Drag & Drop Form Builder
Unrated

Unrated
Form Templates
Unrated

Unrated
A/B Testing
Unrated

Unrated
App Source Code
Unrated

Unrated
Customization option
Unrated

Unrated
Post Templates
Unrated

Unrated
Monetization
Unrated

Unrated
Export/Import
Unrated

Unrated

Ratings

When evaluating weather to go with WD Facebook feed or Slick Social Share Buttons which two criteria is most important to you.

WD Facebook feed offers the best value for money and is also the is easier to use — deciding between the two is a question of tradeoffs.




Standout Features

1. Whitelabel

  • WD Facebook feed
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{Whitelabel_2.status}}

    2. Various feed

  • WD Facebook feed
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{Variousxfeed_2.status}}

    3. Sort & Filter

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{SortxxxFilter_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • 4. Responsive

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{Responsive_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{Responsive_2.status}}

    5. Randomization

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{Randomization_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{Randomization_2.status}}

    6. Post Templates

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{PostxTemplates_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{PostxTemplates_2.status}}

    7. Multi-Page Forms

  • WD Facebook feed
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{MultixPagexForms_2.status}}

    8. Multi Language

  • WD Facebook feed
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{MultixLanguage_2.status}}

    9. Monetization

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{Monetization_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{Monetization_2.status}}

    10. GetResponse Addon

  • WD Facebook feed
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{GetResponsexAddon_2.status}}

    11. Form Templates

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{FormxTemplates_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{FormxTemplates_2.status}}

    12. Export/Import

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{ExportxImport_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{ExportxImport_2.status}}

    13. Easy to Embed

  • WD Facebook feed
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{EasyxtoxEmbed_2.status}}

    14. Drag & Drop Form Builder

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{DragxxxDropxFormxBuilder_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{DragxxxDropxFormxBuilder_2.status}}

    15. Customization option

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{Customizationxoption_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{Customizationxoption_2.status}}

    16. Custom Fields And Taxonomies

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{CustomxFieldsxAndxTaxonomies_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{CustomxFieldsxAndxTaxonomies_2.status}}

    17. Content Curation

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{ContentxCuration_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • 18. Constant Contact Integration

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{ConstantxContactxIntegration_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • 19. App Source Code

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{AppxSourcexCode_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{AppxSourcexCode_2.status}}

    20. Advanced Search & Filtering

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{AdvancedxSearchxxxFiltering_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • 21. A/B Testing

  • WD Facebook feed
  • {{AxBxTesting_1.status}}
  • Slick Social Share Buttons
  • {{AxBxTesting_2.status}}

    We have ordered the list of features above by what users are telling us is more important to them. Technology is fast-moving so we always suggest that you check WD Facebook feed and Slick Social Share Buttons details page for any changes not mentioned here. Looking at the top 3 features Look at Whitelabel both WD Facebook feed and Slick Social Share Buttons scores below the industry.



    Your trust and accuracy is our top concern, we do our best to keep all information up to date and rely on your feedback along with the product creator to ensure the information you see today is accurate, That being said if you have ever used either WD Facebook feed or Slick Social Share Buttons spare 5 seconds of your time to help spot check the information below. Learn more.

    Does WD Facebook feed offer Multi Language feature?
    Does Slick Social Share Buttons offer Support Filters feature?

    SoftwareFindr Radar

    The SoftwareFindr Radar compares all solutions on our platform in your chosen category and tries to segment them to give you a visual representation of the market. All the solutions are compared two-dimensionally which takes into account their FindrScore which is given based on numerous data points and research frequency. The average FindrScore for products like WD Facebook feed is 39 which we've used as a threshold to only show the top 10 solutions.

    The SoftwareFindr Radar compares all solutions on our platform in your chosen category and tries to segment them to give you a visual representation of the market. All the solutions are compared two-dimensionally which takes into account their FindrScore which is given based on numerous data points and research frequency. The average FindrScore for products like WD Facebook feed is 70 which we've used as a threshold to only show the top 10 solutions.

    There is an old notion that higher price equals better quality, whilst that is sometimes the case. The chart above aims to give clarity whether there is a correlation between Price and the FindrScore.

    Pricing


    '; Pricing Model Open Source 17 % Subscription28% '; Freemium25% '; One-time License30% Promotional Offers 6% Free Trials 0%
    $ 9.19

    That is the average price for a solution in this field.

    low Mid High
    After analyzing 36 similar solutions the data above show that Social Media and Share Icons offers the lowest starting price while Wordfence Premium offers the highest entry price.That being said is also worthtaking a closer look at what's on offer because sometimes you may get way more value for a solution with a higher entry price and vise versa.

    Adoption By Geography

    According to our data gathered on our platform WD Facebook feed hasn't got a lead over Slick Social Share Buttons in any country.

    According to our data gathered on our platform Slick Social Share Buttons hasn't got a lead over WD Facebook feed in any country.

    In order to give you more personalized recommendations, we tailor the ranking of a product to reflect what users are currently using in your geographical area.


    Type of Support to Expect


    • Mail
    • Forum
    84%

    Continue to seek out vendors after Good Experience
    70%

    Continue to avoid vendors after Bad Experience.
    • Mail
    • Forum

    Looking at data gathered on our platform the industry average for this category is 74.19% satisfaction rate which means Slick Social Share Buttons is below this threshold and WD Facebook feed is above this threshold

    Video Review


      After analyzing the data on our platform, it's clear that whenever WD Facebook feed and Slick Social Share Buttons go head to head within the same category WD Facebook feed has continued to be more popular over Slick Social Share Buttons. This ranking data gives you a better understanding of how these solutions stack up in various use cases.

      Average FindrScore in this Category

      1. 0%
        Lowest score
      2. 54%
        Average score
      3. ';
        88%
        Highest score

      Behind the scenes


      Hmm,sorry no one has uploaded a screenshot of the user interface yet.

      Hmm,sorry no one has uploaded a screenshot of the user interface yet.

      Which Should You Choose

      It's a win for WD Facebook feed ! WD Facebook feed offers Mail, Forum which users are happy with. Looking at the data gathered on our platform WD Facebook feed has a higher FindrScore of 70 which indicates that it could be a better fit over Slick Social Share Buttons However, you get a lot more functionality and flexibility with Slick Social Share Buttons which you may need to take into consideration. Hopefully, you now have a clear picture of WD Facebook feed and Slick Social Share Buttons pricing, features and user-experience provided these solutions. Both have pros and cons and which you choose will depend on your integration needs, pricing and more. Whichever solution you go with, please come back and leave a review for that product so others can benefit from your experience.

      Download/Demo

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q. Is WD Facebook feed better than Slick Social Share Buttons?

    Ans. We have analyzed 8456 data points to answer this question, in 2024 WD Facebook feed is better than Slick Social Share Buttons. the scoring 89 whilst Slick Social Share Buttons scored 52

    Q. For beginners which is better WD Facebook feed or Slick Social Share Buttons?

    Ans. We ask this very question to our readers and the results are in, WD Facebook feed scored better that Slick Social Share Buttons by 18 points crowing it the most user friendly.

    Q. What's the price difference between WD Facebook feed and Slick Social Share Buttons?

    Ans. The solutions are priced slightly different so calculating the price would need to be over a set period. WD Facebook feed is freemium whilst Slick Social Share Buttons is open source,

    Q. What is the difference between WD Facebook feed and Slick Social Share Buttons?

    Ans. The main difference beyond price and support, is WD Facebook feed has an overall higher FindrScore which looks at over 8456 data points powered by real user testing and overall satisfaction.

    Q. Out of WD Facebook feed and Slick Social Share Buttons which as the better support?

    Ans. The data gathered shows that WD Facebook feed as a slightly better user satisfaction that Slick Social Share Buttons.

    Q. What are a few good alternatives to WD Facebook feed and Slick Social Share Buttons?

    Ans. Users who research WD Facebook feed and Slick Social Share Buttons also look at Jetpack which as a FindrCsore of 84, See 36 more similar solutions

    Q. WD Facebook feed or Slick Social Share Buttons which is good for beginners?

    Ans. Looking at the scorecard for both these products, the results show that WD Facebook feed is better for beginners

    Q. Which is better, WD Facebook feed or Slick Social Share Buttons in 2024?

    Ans. We’ve asked this very question to users like you and the results are in. The majority of users are recommending WD Facebook feed.

    Q. How does WD Facebook feed compare to Slick Social Share Buttons?

    Ans. The main difference beyond price and support, is WD Facebook feed has an overall higher FindrScore which looks at over 8456 data points powered by real user testing and overall satisfaction

    Was this comparison helpful?

    Who wrote this? Tell us why below?Need rewriting! Tell us why below?Average! Tell us why below?Great, but needs more detail.Just what I needed. Thanks (108 votes, average: 2.58 out of 5)
    Loading...